by Garrett O’Brien, originally published 1-May-2015

Part 1 can be viewed by clicking here

I had been waiting for a good counterpoint to debate but all evidence brought forward by those saying Cruz is not eligible fell short of having any sound knowledge, Godly wisdom, or discernment behind their argument.

LOTS of knowledge being used incorrectly does not make a substantiated argument but only a loud fool.

All the neigh sayers were creating Post Hoc Ergo Post Hoc fallacy archive that fell flat long before the posts or articles were even finished.

When any wants to sharpen a knife on a sponge, it is time to take leave and let them be — they are not about to listen to anything or anyone save their own voice and those that agree with it…

I did, however, come across a comment published by one Most Rev. Archbishop Gregori that doesn’t follow the fallacy…

Can’t find much about the Reverend save that he supposedly had a one-on-one conversation with Obama early in 2011 (January or February) [the link provided is broken and Google searches didn’t provide any more clues].

His Disques profile notes him as a member of the Orthodox Catholic clergy in Webster NY and is a contributor to the Patriot Action Network.

Not much else about him is on the internet… yet…

Here’s his rebuttal to one of the fallacies/arguments where the author claimed once again Cruz is not eligible for the U.S. Presidency…

I’ve added links to his references as well as corrected a few items (such as 1874 corrected to 1875 – the year of the hearing and decision of the Minor v Happersett case)

“Cruz is a citizen by birth, but he is NOT a ‘natural born” citizen.’

“In “Minor v. Happersett (1875) archive , the Supreme Court said that, if you were born in the United States and both of your parents were U.S. citizens at the time of your birth, you are, without doubt, a natural-born citizen.

Background: Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1875), is a U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Constitution did not grant women the right to vote. The Supreme Court upheld state court decisions in Missouri, which had refused to register a woman as a lawful voter because that state’s laws allowed only men to vote. The Minor v. Happersett ruling was based on an interpretation of the Privileges or Immunities Clause of the 14th Amendment. The Supreme Court readily accepted that Minor was a citizen of the United States, but it held that the constitutionally protected privileges of citizenship did not include the right to vote. The 19th Amendment, which became a part of the Constitution in 1920, effectively overruled Minor v. Happersett by prohibiting discrimination in voting rights based on sex. Minor v. Happersett continued to be cited in support of restrictive election laws of other types until the 1960s, when the Supreme Court started interpreting the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause to guarantee voting rights. [wikipedia]

“A clear and undeniable holding and binding precedent established by the highest Court of our nation specifically define an Article 2 Section 1 [Clause 5] natural-born citizen as a person born in the U.S. to parents (that’s plural, meaning both Father and Mother) who are citizens.

“Black’s Law Dictionary defines “precedent” as a “rule of law established for the first time by a court for a particular type of case and thereafter referred to in deciding similar cases.

“In the Minor vs. Happersett case, the Court noted that Mrs. Minor was born in the U.S. to parents who were citizens.

“The Court stated that such persons were ‘natural-born citizens’.

The Court also stated – as to such persons – that their ‘citizenship’ was never in doubt.

“By recognizing Mrs. Minor as a member of the class of persons who were natural-born citizens, they established her citizenship which was required before they could get to the issue of whether she had the right to vote.

“By so doing, the Court in Minor directly construed Article 2 Section 1 of the US Constitution.

“In order for this precedent to be reversed, 1 of 2 things are necessary…

  1. A Constitutional amendment which specifically defines ‘natural born Citizen’ more inclusively than Minor did, or;
  2. A Supreme Court case to overrule the definition of a natural-born citizen in the Minor case.


“The argument as to whether Barack Obama was born in Hawaii or Kenya is really a moot point, because even IF he was born in Hawaii, he would be a citizen of the United States, but NOT a “natural born” citizen because his father was not a U.S. citizen at the time of Obama’s birth.

Counterpoint: True however his mother WAS a U.S. citizen at the time of Obama’s birth. The Law of Nations is credited with placing the father as the determining factor of a child’s citizenship. In both Obama and Cruz’s cases, their mothers were U.S. citizens at the time of their births (and still are in Cruz’s case, Obama’s mother did die as a U.S.citizen). In Obama’s case, his father never pursued U.S. citizenship — in Cruz’s case, his father did gain U.S citizenship in 2005. Obama’s mother had to have been a resident of the U.S. for 10 years, at least 5 of which were beyond the age of 14. Ann Dunham did not meet that requirement (of the Nationality Act of 1940, revised June 1952) until her 19th birthday in late November of 1961, almost four months after Obama was born, further removing Obama’s eligibility as a citizen (my personal opinion agrees with many that say we have an illegitimate President).

“Marco Rubio was born in May 1971 in Miami, Florida, which makes him a “CITIZEN” of the U.S. His parents were legal immigrants from Cuba.

“They did NOT become U.S. citizens until November 1975, which makes Rubio a U.S. citizen at birth, but not a natural-born citizen.

“Ted Cruz was born in Canada.

“His father was born in Cuba, lived in the U.S. on a student visa, who then went to Canada and became a Canadian citizen.

“Cruz’s father did not become a naturalized U.S. citizen until 2005.

“Therefore, it can be argued that since Ted Cruz’s mother holds U.S. citizenship, then Ted is also a U.S. citizen at birth, but not a natural-born citizen.

“However, having been born in Canada and his father holding Canadian citizenship at the time, means that Ted also holds dual citizenship with Canada and the United States.

“This makes him doubly ineligible to be president.

“Cruz announced he was giving up his dual citizenship when the issue of his ineligibility came up in mid – 2013.

“Apparently, Cruz believes that he [can] make himself a legal ‘natural born’ citizen at any time, just by renouncing his Canadian citizenship.

“Here is the inconvenient truth: Sorry, Ted, but like the fraud in the White House, you were born with dual citizenship, and you cannot become a ‘natural -orn’ citizen even if you do renounce your Canadian citizenship.

It just doesn’t work that way.

Counterpoint: There’s nothing saying dual citizens don’t count as natural-born — no source documentation can be found that says anything of this sort. Cruz’s desire to renounce his Canadian Citizenship came about after ‘The Dallas Morning News’ brought the Canadian citizenship matter to his attention archive . Cruz immediately started the renunciation process as his allegiance and heart are with the U.S. and not split between Canada and the U.S. The Reverend, while documenting strongly in the beginning has now fallen upon personal opinion and has not provided anything documented to substantiate his claim.

“Even though Cruz was born in Canada, he was American from the moment of his birth.

“Cruz’s mother, Eleanor Darragh, was a US citizen from Delaware archive .

“His father, Rafael Cruz, was a Cuban national who had received a green card while living in the US archive (he eventually became a US citizen in 2005).

“Under American law archive , Cruz would be born an American despite having only one US citizen parent as long as that parent — his mother — had physically lived in the United States for at least 10 years and 5 of those years had been after her 14th birthday.

“Cruz’s mother easily cleared that bar, so Cruz’s citizenship is not debatable.

“In the case of Bobby Jindal, his parents arrived Feb 1, 1971, his mother was 5 months pregnant when they arrived on U.S. soil and obtained green cards, and a bit over 4 months later, on June 10, 1971, Piyush (Bobby) Jindal was born at Woman’s Hospital in Baton Rouge Louisiana.

“His parents were not U.S. citizens at the time of his birth; they were here on green cards.

“His mother became a citizen in 1976, his father in 1986. Jindal is a U.S. citizen at birth, but not a natural-born citizen.

“It can also be argued Jindal became a U.S. citizen via the fraudulent ‘anchor baby’ bastardization of the 14th Amendment.

“In any case, his parents were not illegals since they obtained green cards, but they were not U.S. citizens at the time of his birth.”

I have not shared all my opinions here, mostly due to time constraints at the time of this publication.

We all know this is NOT going to go away and the Left will undoubtedly make an issue of it while sweeping Obama’s citizenship issues under the rug or sealing them up permanently somehow in a court of law.

Your counterpoints and supporting points are welcome on social media (comments were closed at the time of this republication)…

image credit :
image credit :


Currently, comments are closed. We have just returned online and are rebuilding many facets of our site. Comments on our site are temporarily disabled until we have the programming for the management of comments tested and placed into production.

About Garrett O’Brien

Garrett is the owner of DecisiveLiberty.News. Formerly a Liberal then a Republican, Garrett has seen political parties by default look out for themselves and not the people. Garrett now focuses specifically on our Constitution as it is written. He uses Decisive Liberty as a platform to provide a voice to those that believe neither political party are protecting our Constitution nor our Rights to their fullest as our Founding Fathers wrote them in the First 10 Amendments. For the moment, Garrett resides in Brazil with his wife.

Recent Posts by Garrett O'BrienView more...

The Electoral College – Avoiding Highly Populated Districts From Running the Entire Country (11/30/2022) - Our founding Fathers were MUCH wiser than their years - unlike many politicians today who want to change things around to the favor, only to forget that some day in the future they will be on the receiving end of what they thought was a fairly implemented law or protocol.
VIDEO: Ex-Muslim Destroys Leftist Islam Defenders in Germany (11/28/2022) - An EXCELLENT presentation by an ex-Muslim in a debate on German television (English subtitles provided). Before too long into the video, there is no doubt who has and who has not read their Quran in full. (archive
Everyone’s Liberty Must Be Protected, Not Just The Liberty of Those You Like (11/28/2022) - In every situation, the guilty are always the least affected -- always... Good character is not of any value to such people, only their ways and means of getting what they want -- like the selfish, petulant child that needs a hard, swift whack on the back of the head several times... (archive
An Offensive Move Against a Warring State Is A Defensive Posture Not A Phobia (11/26/2022) - When it comes down to protecting what we treasure, the best defense is always a good offense... Unless, of course, someone is clueless as to how valuable what it is we have. At that point, we're dealing with ignorance - plain, clean, and simple and Liberty STILL must be protected. (archive
We Are At a Precipice – Focus On What Matters, Not On Matters That Will Never Be Settled (11/25/2022) - The principles laid forth in our Constitution were constructed by a generation whose spiritual and brainpower have yet to be matched since Andrew Jackson. All the principles in our Constitution were derived from the very same principles, like it or not, found in both the Torah as well as the Bible.(archive
When Good Character Meets False Accusations (11/25/2022) - Strong character is forged only through tests. The fact that we never get to choose the tests is what makes each test unique as well as the best means to hone our character. Life is not like a sponge - it is more like a rock. Honing requires a hard surface, not a soft one. Something most enemies forget. (archive


Democratic Arizona Gov.-elect Katie Hobbs speaks at a victory rally, Tuesday, Nov. 15, 2022, in Phoenix. An Arizona judge on Thursday, Dec. 1, ordered Cochise... continue
02-Dec-22 01:12
OANN Global [15 m]
by Sophia Flores
TORRANCE, Calif.—Authorities Dec. 1 identified the two men killed in the crash of a single-engine plane as it attempted to land at Zamperini Field in... continue
02-Dec-22 01:12
The Epoch Times US [15 m]
by City News Service
Via The Cradle,The Lebanese parliament on Thursday failed for the eighth consecutive time to elect a new president, as a majority of lawmakers continue to... continue
02-Dec-22 01:12
Zero Hedge [15 m]
by Tyler Durden
02-Dec-22 01:12
Breitbart Politics [15 m] 10m
by Paul Bois
By Zachary Stieber of the Epoch TimesThe U.S. Senate on Dec. 1 approved legislation aimed at heading off a nationwide rail strike, a day after the... continue
02-Dec-22 01:12
Zero Hedge [15 m]
by Tyler Durden
LOS ANGELES—One of Karen Bass’s stepdaughters suffered minor injuries Dec. 1 when the vehicle she was driving was struck by a hit-and-run driver, the Los... continue
02-Dec-22 01:12
The Epoch Times US [15 m]
by City News Service

BANNED DOCUMENTARY: Conspiracy Of Silence (1993)

Conspiracy Of Silence Is a documentary film detailing an alleged child sex scandal that involved many children from a Nebraska Institution, Boys Town, and Lawrence King - or Lawrence "Larry" King.

The organized child sex parties implicated the Reagan and Bush White House during the 1980s.

King was the ringleader of the sex ring which had links to other fellow political conservatives in Washington D.C., including

  • Republican Lobbyist Craig J. Spence
  • Sen. Elizabeth Dole's Staff, along with
  • members of the financial elite of Nebraska

It features former CIA Director William Colby talking about the high-level child kidnap and sex-slave ring.

The book that was the basis of this movie can be found by clicking here.

Reflections from Decisive Liberty

The following stance is stated in the final paragraph of the oration given for the unveiling of our Statue of Liberty on the 28th of October, 1886....

... there is room in America and brotherhood for all who will support our institutions and aid in our development; but those who come to disturb our peace and dethrone our laws are aliens and enemies forever.

You can view the full oration by clicking here.

We at Decisive Liberty are committed to this stance and welcome all - if you have not already - to join us in learning to live by this stance.

There are only 2 nations that have placed God within their Constitution: one was created by God for the people He loves, the other created by the people who love Him.

PROMOTION: Check out our Substack site - just click this image to get your invite

Click the image above to receive your invite to our Substack content.
Once approved, you will automaticlaly subscribed to our Substack newsletter.
All Substack content is free and arrives once or twice a day!
You can easily unsubscribe from any newsletter.
See our home page for the lastest 3 topics we have published.

Our Pledge

DL Pledge

Previous and Next Available Post

Enable Notifications OK No thanks